The problem with peer review: how can we promote diversity and inclusivity in a closed off process? Catherine Walker from Sense about Science discusses.
The problem with peer review: how can we promote diversity and inclusivity in a closed off process? Catherine Walker from Sense about Science discusses.
Once you’ve received your first invitation to review a manuscript, what process should you follow? What are the habits of effective peer reviewers?
In a previous post we looked at the many reasons why you should consider becoming a reviewer. Reviewing can benefit […]
There are many demands on a researcher’s time today and so it is a legitimate question to ask why some […]
Despite its flaws, peer review is fundamental to the integrity of scholarly communication. It helps to ensure that published research […]
Peer Review Week is a global event celebrating the essential role that peer review plays in maintaining research quality. It […]
The peer review process is vital to the strength of a journal, evaluating the quality, validity, and relevance of scholarly […]
We’re proud to be a sponsor of the series of excellent peer review workshops run each year by Sense about […]
It’s a common question: what happens to my article after submission, when it enters the mysterious world of peer review? […]
Peer review is a process that involves various players – the author, the reviewer and the editor to name a […]