Pros | Cons | |
---|---|---|
Less risk of conscious or unconscious bias from either the reviewer, or the author | It’s not possible to guarantee the anonymity of the author. For example, if the reviewer was already familiar with their work or had heard that someone was working on a particular topic | |
Reviewers can feel more protected from criticism of their review | Some reviewers may use their anonymity to write reviews that are rushed, rude, or unfair, which they might not do if their name was being associated with the comments | |
- 7 tips for communicating research to the public
- 8 useful research paper writing tools and resources
- 3 great tools and resources to help you choose a journal
- Introducing Routledge Open Research
- 10 trending open access articles
- Help achieve your writing goals with this simple tip
- 5 tips on how to become a peer reviewer
- New journal homepages on Taylor & Francis Online
- Top 10 open access articles in STM
- Sharing your data for real-world impact
- Author name changes for published articles
- Humanities publishing and impact workshops
- Top 10 open access articles published in 2020 revealed
- Find related research easily
- Our new approach to Open Select APCs
- From COVID-19 to mental health - Top 10 open access most read
- 4 skills for researchers of the future
- Standing up for Science workshop
- COVID-19 resources and support for you
- Accessing journals while you’re off campus
- Share Taylor & Francis journal articles using an eReader
- Open access journals and Impact Factors
- Are open access journals good quality?
- Making a clear link between clinical trials and journal articles
- Standing up for science: hear from researchers, policymakers, and journalists
- 3 key tips for determining your audience
- Journals introduce a new open and FAIR data policy
- Listen to the latest research when and how you want to
- How Researchers Changed the World
- Researcher survey 2019
- Access Taylor & Francis research on the move with Researcher
- Ask for peer-reviewed evidence
- Leadership training and networking events for women in research
- 5 things publishers do (that I didn’t expect)
- Open access: the most read-research of 2019
- Research integrity and selective reporting bias
- "One of the best experiences I’ve had during my PhD"
- Learn from the experts: peer review & standing up for science
- Introducing a simple way to submit your bioRxiv preprint to a journal
- Increasing the discoverability of new articles via the Web of Science
- Presenting your research effectively and with confidence
- Publishing in international journals
- Academic conference tips
- Evidence Week at the UK Parliament
- New challenges for research integrity
- Celebrating outstanding research by doctoral students
- How press campaigns help maximize the impact of your research
- Open access: the most read research of 2018
- Science communication: the view from researchers, policy makers and journalists
- Boosting the public perception of science
- Research that makes an impact
- The Centre of Open Science and promoting openness in research
- Creating policy change as a social scientist
- Public engagement and initiating change in a tangible, real way
- Open Science Badges
- How the Social Sciences help us understand ourselves
- The role of early career researchers in improving peer review diversity
- Tips for writing a literature review
- Transform your conference paper into a prize-winning journal article
- Accessing research in the developing world using the STAR inititative
- Extracting a journal article from your thesis
- The benefits of online reading groups
- Frequently asked questions
- Gender and publishing: a PhD student’s perspective
- Should you share your data?
- Tracking the commercialization of research
- 3 ways to make the most of your society membership
- Turning your journal article into a blog post
- Why should you become a peer reviewer?
- 3 things to consider before writing your journal article
- Research that gives a voice to practitioners and activists
- Women in Geoscience
- Open access: 2017’s most popular research
- Tips to get motivated for 2018: a winner’s story
- Getting started in peer review
- p-values and the future of statistical inference
- How mentoring can improve PhD students research proposals
- 3 tips for interdisciplinary writing
- Communicating research and change-making
- How to get your first journal article published
- How to make sure your book is discoverable
- Influencing policy: a researcher’s perspective
- STEM Hero: a statistics success story
- Hooking your audience: tips for presenting your research
- 3 articles that made an impact
- Making papers accessible to a general audience
- Bringing together academics and policymakers
- Reaching “on-the-ground practitioners”
- Project funding: society enables a career-defining trip to Afghanistan
- Society-funded travel scholarships help researchers on a Greenlandic adventure
- Society awards: the importance of early-career recognition
- How societies support researchers at every career stage
- 5 ways societies can amplify your research impact
- How societies help researchers manage continuing professional development
- Co-authorship in the Humanities and Social Sciences
- Writing a scientific literature review
- Three key steps in scientific writing
- Women in Economics, where are they?
- Celebrating outstanding scholarship in China
- Original Research: Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs
- Turning your PhD into a successful book
- 3 tips for getting your dissertation published
- How do you write a prize-winning literature review?
- Communicating your research to policy makers and journalists
- Can you publish and still perish? A question of impact
- Hands up for peer review
- Winner’s story: Ida Danewid
- Experiencing impostor syndrome: walking up the down escalator
- From figure skater to doctoral researcher
- Taylor & Francis Online: Making your research more discoverable
- Three Minute Thesis: a winner’s story
- Teaching statistics in Africa: volunteering for AIMS-Tanzania
- Starting out the ‘right’ way
- In the words of your peers: how to get networking
- World Malaria Day 2017: Research Interview
- 3 minutes to pitch your research
- Why should you peer review?
- Research in developing countries: the inside track
- Opening up citations
- Staying research active
- My ‘irrelevant’ PhD
- Adventures in film ? research through the camera lens
- Winner’s Story: Carla Luguetti
- Don’t get it right; get it written
- What is creative research? (and why it matters)
- Postdoc Takeover Week
- 15 minutes to develop your research career
- Mentoring matters: catch up on our #tfmentoring Twitter discussion
- Why did you choose to become a gender studies researcher?
- Nuclear energy research in public discussion
- 3 reasons you should go on a placement during your PhD
- ‘Mysterious, surprising, and numerous’: the PhD guide to conferences
- Capturing the interest of the public
- New partnership supports statistics teaching in Africa
- Branching out: careers for PhDs outside academia
- Winner’s story: Kowiyou Yessoufou
- Interview: Fiona Sampson MBE, editor of Poem – part 2
- Interview: Fiona Sampson MBE, editor of Poem – part 1
- Winner’s story: Gerrit Bloothooft and David Onland
- What’s happening to our universities?
- Research stories: Ronald L. Wasserstein in The American Statistician
- OA research stories: Elisa Bonaccorso
- Research stories: Marte Blikstad-Balas on Wikipedia use in schools
- 5 reasons to sign up to Taylor & Francis Insights
- Taylor & Francis Newsroom: a new look, and new services for journalists
- A ‘Nuts and bolts of peer review’ workshop
- 5 ways Taylor & Francis maximizes the reach of research
- Waiver policy for former Co-Action Publishing journals
- Getting your research policy-ready
- Winner’s story: Dr. Iris Fleßenkämper and Professor Stanislaw Koziara
- 16 things you might not know about ECRs
- Making the case for education
- Supporting early career researchers in ways that count
- Working in collaboration: the ‘Being Human’ Festival
- Winner’s story: Lauren White and Guy Faulkner
- Research stories: the struggle to recognize yourself as a ‘researcher’
- ‘Life on the other side’: from PhD to publishing placement
- Drug Evaluations: Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
- 6 steps to take your research from idea to action
- Dr Gary James on promoting research in the media
- Winner’s story: Peter Cronkleton and Anne Larson
- Research stories: on drama, autism and education
- The Taylor & Francis Editorial Office team
- Public engagement: our approach and why it really matters
- Scholars in social media: an interview with George Veletsianos
- Audio engagement and the power of a podcast
- Winner’s story: Mathew Manwaring
- OA research stories: Rob Kitchin
- Winner’s story: Professor Hideo Hosono
- Winner’s story: Dr Syeda Shahida Batool and Dr Richard de Visser
- 7 reasons why every PhD student should attend academic conferences
- Is academia fairly portrayed in the press?
- 5 tips for communicating your research
- Examining the marriage of emerging technologies and fashion
- Pharmaprojects
- Pharmacological Profile
- Meta-analysis
- Meeting Highlights
- Original Research: Expert Review
- Meta-opinion
- Clinical Trial Evaluation
- Treatment Evaluation
- Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation
- Original Research: Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets
- Original Research: Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
- Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology
- Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs
- Original Research: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
- Original Research: Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery
- Original Research: Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
- Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology
- Drug Evaluation: Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs
- Drug Evaluation: Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs
- Drug Evaluation: Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
- Review Article: Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs
- Technology Evaluation
- Device Profile Guidelines
- Diagnostic Profile
- Technology Report: Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
- Interviews
- Letter to the Editor
- Meeting Report
- Clinical Trial Report
- Drug Profile
- Special Report: Expert Collection
- Perspective: Expert Review
- Perspective: Expert Opinion
- Editorial: Expert Review
- Review: Expert Review
- Presenting your research: approaches, benefits and career development
- Formatting guidelines for Expert Collection journals
- Drug Discovery Case History
- Patent Evaluation
- Drug Safety Evaluation
- Editorial: Expert Opinion
- Winner’s story: Stuart McGill, David Frost, Kevin Darby, Thomas Lam, Tim Finlay and Jordan Cannon
- Public engagement, science communication and this year’s 3MT
- OA research stories: Dr. Daniel Cameron
- Winner’s story: Donald G. Stein
- OA research stories: Dr. Paul Kelley
- Winner’s story: Prayga Chalise, David Ouvrard and Diana Percy
- Drug Evaluation
- Review Article: Expert Opinion
- Winner’s story: Michelle Specktor
- Winner’s story: Déborah Closset-Kopp
- 5 steps to improving your research visibility
- Winner’s story: Joanne Chassot
- Winner’s story: Philip Holden
- Winner’s story: Martyn Kurr
- Style guidelines in preparation
- Digital research practices: the real user experience
- Winner’s story: Joy Chong
- 5 tips for using online submissions systems
- Mentoring and support on a PhD studentship
- Sorry, this reference style is not yet available
- Digital research practices
- Winner’s story: Julie Ingram, Damian Maye, James Kirwan, Nigel Curry, and Katarina Kubinakova
- Equipping early career researchers to get involved in peer review
- How do early career researchers ‘publish and thrive’?
- Sharing your research findings, boosting your career
- Winner’s Story: Matthew Moran and Wyn Bowen
- A new scholar’s perspective on open peer review
- Review papers, OA, co-authors: your open access research stories
- Your open access research stories
- Peer review is fundamental to the scientific process
- Key paper evaluation: Expert Collection
- Winner’s story: Stacey Rimikis
- Winner’s story: Matt Haultain-Gall
- Winner’s story: Jenessa Banwell
- Winner’s story: Jeff Baxter
- Winner’s story: Heather Dial
- Winner’s story: Fred Stielow
- Winner’s story: Chad Doerr
- Winner’s story: Agnieszka Sobocinska
- Becoming a book reviewer
- Publishing with Taylor & Francis
- Making sure your article gets seen
- Getting published
- Understanding the publishing process
- Rewarding authors
- Cartoon abstracts
Featured video