A short introduction to data sharing ethics - Author Services

We use cookies to improve your website experience. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. By closing this message, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

A short introduction to data sharing ethics

Sharing your research data can be hugely beneficial to your career, as well as to the scholarly community and wider society. But before you proceed, there are some important ethical considerations to keep in mind. 

Research involving human subjects 

Sometimes research data involving people cannot be shared publicly due to the risk of violating privacy (see below). However, even highly sensitive information might be shared ethically and legally if you follow these steps. 

More information about protection of human subjects may be provided via ethics committees in your location or subject area. 

1. Ask for informed consent to share the data 

Taylor & Francis endorses the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which emphasizes that patients and study participants have a right to privacy that should not be infringed without informed consent.  

You should communicate openly with your participants to let them know exactly how their data will be used and shared both in the short and long term. If your correspondence is ignored, you mustn’t take this as inferred consent. Data sharing should always be consistent with the terms of consent signed by participants. 

Please read our Editorial Policies, which include further details about obtaining informed consent to publish

2. Protect identities by fully anonymizing the data 

How to anonymize data 

Please take care to anonymize any data that may otherwise identify study participants. The UK Data Service best practice guide to managing and sharing data has lots of good advice about how to anonymize your data, including:  

  • Remove anything that identifies the subject: this might include names, addresses, workplaces, occupations, or salaries. 
  • Take out unnecessarily precise information: for example, you can replace subjects’ date of birth with their age.
  • Generalize where you can: for example, replace subjects’ specific area of expertise with more general definitions 
  • Use pseudonyms 
  • Avoid listing the upper or lower ranges of variables: this will disguise outliers, such as salary range for example. 

Pay special attention to relational data where relationships between variables in datasets could reveal identities and where geo-referenced data and spatial references may reveal location.  

How to manage data anonymization 

  • Plan ahead: it helps if you consider your data anonymizing plans early on in the research process while you are in the process of collecting them – if you don’t, it might prove time consuming and costly.  
  • Keep the original data separate and secure: it is essential to keep a copy of the original data for your own use and make a record of all the information that has been removed in the process of anonymization. Always store this information separately from the final anonymized data files and ensure that it is secure. 
  • Be transparent about where you’ve anonymized data: when you remove content and replace it with generalized information, mark this in an obvious way. For example, show that you have edited interview text with brackets or use markup tags.  

3. Control access to your data, where necessary 

We support the principle that research data should be as open as possible but as closed as necessary. For sensitive data you may only want to make available to third parties who have a legitimate reason and who you are certain will treat the data carefully.   

In these instances, it is still possible to deposit your data in a repository but restrict access to it. This might mean that the files are private, but you can share access with others if certain requirements are met. You may also want to set different privacy settings for different components of your data. Some of the generalist repositories offering this type of functionality include Figshare, Zenodo, and OSF. Read our guide to data repositories for more details. 

However, in some cases you should not share your data with third parties … 

Knowing when not to share data 

There are some situations however where it would not be legal or ethical to share information. These exceptions include:  

When sharing data conflicts with a need to protect personal identities 

If consent hasn’t been sought or if study participants have withheld their consent, data should not be shared unless they can be anonymized (see above). Strict data protection laws, such as the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation, also set out how personal information should (and shouldn’t) be collected, stored, and shared. You should always ensure that you abide by all relevant data legislation. 

When you don’t have ownership of the data 

If you don’t own the data you’ve used in your research, you shouldn’t publish them without the owner’s written permission. Preferably, the owner of the data should make it available themselves, which you can then cite: please see our guide to citing data

Where data is commercially sensitive or protected by competition laws or market regulation 

If your data has been generated while employed by or partnering with a commercial organization, you should seek permission before sharing it. In some instances, there may be commercial or legal reasons why data can’t be made widely available. 

Where release of the data poses a security risk  

Depending on your field of research, making some research available could pose risks either to individuals or to national security. 

Sub judice 

You may not be able to share data which is under consideration in any legal actions. 

Protection of threatened species 

To support conservation activities, you may need to restrict geographical information about at-risk flora or fauna 

If you ever have any doubts about whether it would be right to share a particular dataset, your institution’s research ethics committee should be able to help. 

Orange lightbulb icon

Please note that even if you decide it isn’t right to share your data publicly, you may be required to make them available to peer reviewers, to support validation of results in your journal article submission.

Taking down data 

Sometimes you may need to remove data that you’ve published in a repository. You might have data that can be held legally for a specific period before you must destroy it, or errors might be detected, to name just a couple of cases. 

Data repositories have established practices for updating versions of data if you need to correct them, and for tagging metadata and landing pages for datasets that have been removed. Please check the website of your chosen repository for further information. 

Further resources 

Data sharing ethics 

Please take a look at the following specialist resources for more detail on the themes we’ve introduced above: 

Research and publishing ethics 

For further guidance on broader issues of research and publishing ethics, please see: 

Data sharing guides 

Publishing tips, direct to your inbox

Be guided through your publishing journey with updates, tips and talking points from Taylor & Francis. Useful resources delivered straight to your inbox. Thank us later.